On This Page On This Page AUTOCLAVING 101 Learn how to safely and confidently operate an autoclave with our free training course. Start the Course Biosafety Level Guidance for COVID-19 Research Written by: Scott Mechler BS Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineer What biosafety level is required to handle samples and/or perform research containing the SARS-CoV-2 virus? Read on for the latest recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Background A Biological Safety Level (BSL 1, 2, 3, or 4) is assigned to a biological lab as a safeguard to protect laboratory personnel, as well as the surrounding environment and community. With research into potential treatments, therapies and vaccines for the SARS-CoV-2 virus (known widely as the COVID-19 Coronavirus) exploding across the globe, many institutions and laboratories are wondering whether their equipment and lab are considered safe to contain samples of the virus. As discussed in our previous blog on biosafety levels, airborne transmissible diseases like COVID-19 are typically categorized as Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3). BSL-3 laboratories are almost always purpose-constructed containment laboratories, outfitted with specialized equipment and HVAC systems designed to ensure no airborne particles can exit the contained space. Current Guidance The CDC has recently outlined biosafety guidelines specific to SARS-CoV-2 isolates or cultures, recommending that virus isolation and characterization of viral agents from SAR-CoV-2 specimens must be processed within a BSL-3 laboratory space using BSL-3 procedures. However, they have also recommended that a BSL-2 laboratory may perform routine diagnostic testing (refer to CDC for list of tests) of specimens using Standard Precautions. Further, CDC recommends procedures like virus concentration, precipitation or filtration may be performed in a unidirectional air-flow BSL-2 provided certain BSL-3 precautions and procedures are followed. Recommendations provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) are largely in line with the CDC’s Guidance. It is important to note that this new WHO document, released March 18 2020, provides updated recommendations as compared to the often referenced, but now older, WHO recommendations published February 12 2020. Risk assessments are crucial when determining the required bio-safety level as well as other handling and PPE procedures. Unfortunately, as of the date of this writing, NIH has not classified SARS-CoV-2 into a specific Risk Group. However, NIH has classified SARS-CoV-1 as Risk Group 3. The International Society for Advancement of Cytometry or ISAC has released specific sorting protocols for diagnostic procedures, publishing these standard operating procedures online. Laboratory employees working with suspected coronavirus samples within BSL-2 environments should adhere to strict aerosol transmission prevention measures, such as: Tyvek full body suit and gloves, HEPA filtered powered air-purifying respirator Perform all sorting and diagnostics within operational HEPA filtered aerosol management system Wipe down all surfaces before and after sorting and diagnostic procedures with 70% ethanol or 10% hypochlorite Operate only within a facility with negative relative air pressure with respect to surrounding spaces with exhaust air vented directly to the outside rather than recirculating to other spaces Written record of containment measurement and safety checklist The American Biological Safety Association (ABSA) has published a useful reference chart explaining the CDC & WHO guidance by categorizing specific laboratory procedures and the appropriate BSL requirements. Further the ABSA document discusses practices and techniques, PPE as well as suggested administrative controls. For additional biosafety level guidance for COVID-19, contact Consolidated Sterilizer Systems today. Tweet Like Share
Biosafety Level Guidance for COVID-19 Research Written by: Scott Mechler BS Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineer What biosafety level is required to handle samples and/or perform research containing the SARS-CoV-2 virus? Read on for the latest recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Background A Biological Safety Level (BSL 1, 2, 3, or 4) is assigned to a biological lab as a safeguard to protect laboratory personnel, as well as the surrounding environment and community. With research into potential treatments, therapies and vaccines for the SARS-CoV-2 virus (known widely as the COVID-19 Coronavirus) exploding across the globe, many institutions and laboratories are wondering whether their equipment and lab are considered safe to contain samples of the virus. As discussed in our previous blog on biosafety levels, airborne transmissible diseases like COVID-19 are typically categorized as Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3). BSL-3 laboratories are almost always purpose-constructed containment laboratories, outfitted with specialized equipment and HVAC systems designed to ensure no airborne particles can exit the contained space. Current Guidance The CDC has recently outlined biosafety guidelines specific to SARS-CoV-2 isolates or cultures, recommending that virus isolation and characterization of viral agents from SAR-CoV-2 specimens must be processed within a BSL-3 laboratory space using BSL-3 procedures. However, they have also recommended that a BSL-2 laboratory may perform routine diagnostic testing (refer to CDC for list of tests) of specimens using Standard Precautions. Further, CDC recommends procedures like virus concentration, precipitation or filtration may be performed in a unidirectional air-flow BSL-2 provided certain BSL-3 precautions and procedures are followed. Recommendations provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) are largely in line with the CDC’s Guidance. It is important to note that this new WHO document, released March 18 2020, provides updated recommendations as compared to the often referenced, but now older, WHO recommendations published February 12 2020. Risk assessments are crucial when determining the required bio-safety level as well as other handling and PPE procedures. Unfortunately, as of the date of this writing, NIH has not classified SARS-CoV-2 into a specific Risk Group. However, NIH has classified SARS-CoV-1 as Risk Group 3. The International Society for Advancement of Cytometry or ISAC has released specific sorting protocols for diagnostic procedures, publishing these standard operating procedures online. Laboratory employees working with suspected coronavirus samples within BSL-2 environments should adhere to strict aerosol transmission prevention measures, such as: Tyvek full body suit and gloves, HEPA filtered powered air-purifying respirator Perform all sorting and diagnostics within operational HEPA filtered aerosol management system Wipe down all surfaces before and after sorting and diagnostic procedures with 70% ethanol or 10% hypochlorite Operate only within a facility with negative relative air pressure with respect to surrounding spaces with exhaust air vented directly to the outside rather than recirculating to other spaces Written record of containment measurement and safety checklist The American Biological Safety Association (ABSA) has published a useful reference chart explaining the CDC & WHO guidance by categorizing specific laboratory procedures and the appropriate BSL requirements. Further the ABSA document discusses practices and techniques, PPE as well as suggested administrative controls. For additional biosafety level guidance for COVID-19, contact Consolidated Sterilizer Systems today. Tweet Like Share
7.12.23 Cordyceps Sterilization: How to Kill “The Last of Us” Parasite → In HBO’s recent adaptation of “The Last of Us,” a popular action-adventure video game, life as we know it is upended by a parasitic fungus that transforms its human hosts into zombies. The culprit? Cordyceps, a real-life genus of fungus which is best known for infecting insects (most famously ants) in much the same manner […]
6.30.23 Top 13 Sterile Processing Mistakes in Hospitals → When it comes to ensuring patient safety in hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), the Sterile Processing Department (SPD) is among the last lines of defense. It’s this department’s sole responsibility to make sure that reusable instruments and devices are properly decontaminated, sterilized, and ultimately safe to use in future procedures — protecting patients from […]
6.22.23 Sterilization vs. High-Level and Low-Level Disinfection [a 3-Point Comparison] → In a 1939 paper, microbiologist Earle H. Spaulding introduced a system for determining which medical devices and instruments needed disinfection and which ones required sterilization. In it, he proposed that critical instruments would need to be subjected to more stringent disinfection protocols than non-critical patient care items. Today, this framework is fittingly known as Spaulding […]